Monday, February 21, 2011

Reflective Essay Outside Reading: February 21

Reflective Essay Outside Reading
“Paranormal Activity” by Stef Willen
(Column 8 of Total Loss: A Column About Inventorying Other People’s Tragedies)
McSweeney’s February 17, 2011

            As the title “Paranormal Activity” alludes to, in this piece Stef Willen discusses her encounter with a ghost.  While staying at a Bed and Breakfast, she meets a couple who is determined to convince her of the reality of the three ghosts that inhabit the Bed and Breakfast as well.  At the beginning of her essay, Willen is entirely skeptical of the existence of ghosts.  However, as her piece continues, she begins to believe in the possibility of “paranormal activity.”   By making appropriate rhetoric choices, Willen is able to lead the reader through this hilarious progression and keep him or her engaged along the way.
            Willen crafts a humorous, and almost ridiculous, tone in this essay.  When one character, Bob, attempts to convince her of the ghost that is sitting on the couch next to her, she juxtaposes her explanation of him as a character and is able to introduce sarcasm to her essay.  “Yesterday, I learned that Bob’s special power was guessing the gender of unborn things…  Now, where I saw empty chairs and throw pillows, he claimed to see the souls of people who were not of this world” (3).  By adding this sense of humor, Willen is able to keep the reader engaged and leaves them wanting more.  She also seems to exaggerate a lot that happens in her recount of her stay at the Bed and Breakfast.  She lends an entire paragraph to discussing the lust she feels towards this ghost and uses a lot of short sentences to keep the tension high.  “I closed my eyes and felt myself fall further into a warmth, and it was exactly like falling into the dress of a beautiful woman, all the way to the buttons.  The warmth was real” (5).  Such language definitely adds to the ridicule of the piece and kept me completely engaged as I read Willen’s essay.  However, the tone that she adopts would not be appropriate for an AP essay.  Despite the informality though, the humor that Willen employs is definitely her biggest strength.  In crafting such a hilarious essay, she leaves the reader wanting more. 
            Willen is also effective in constructing sentences rich in imagery, which further adds to the ridiculous tone she adopts.  The reader can picture everything that Willen explains, and she thus is able to communicate efficiently.  “I opened my bedroom door a crack, … put on tinted lint balm, and got into bed and waited” (6).  Willen often also goes into so much detail that not much is left up for imagination.  “I could lounge in the parlor on a Victorian medallion-back sofa and flop my hand into one of several nearby bowls of bon bons, pop two into my mouth at once” (2).  This imagery is vital in creating the ludicrous tone that Willen implements in her essay, and as a result, the reader is able to simply sit back and enjoy an outlandish tale.

Editorial Oustide Reading: February 21

Editorial Outside Reading
“The Information” by Adam Gopnik
The New Yorker February 14. 2011

            In “The Information,” Adam Gopnik discusses the effects of technology on society.  His editorial focuses on the Internet, but in analyzing its ramifications, Gopnik also discusses television and Gutenberg’s printing press.  For the majority of the piece, Gopnik addresses society’s contrasting opinions of the Internet, and then concludes by revealing his own thesis.  This approach is extremely effective; Gopnik makes appropriate rhetoric choices in this piece that allow him to clearly communicate, and in the end, the reader is left unsettled and convinced.
            Gopnik connects to the reader in his first paragraph, and in so doing makes his essay relatable.  In contrasting J.K. Rowling’s Hermione Granger to the Google-oriented youth of today, Gopnik is able to frame his argument and introduce a scenario to which the reader can relate.  As the analysis that follows the first paragraph is detailed, this hook is essential.  Gopnik also employs language in helping the reader to stay engaged.  Although his argument is undoubtedly complex, he adds a lot of humor to the piece that lightens the mood and thus helps the reader to remain interested.  Although this informality would be inappropriate for an AP level essay, these constant connections to the reader are Gopnik’s biggest strength.  The little bits of humor and allusions to works such as Harry Potter leave the reader wanting more and prompt him or her to continue wading through Gopnik’s analysis.  It’s also important to mention the alliteration that Gopnik employs; in adding this to the language, he is able to point out to the reader what is really important.
            Gopnik also makes his piece fairly ordinary.  He chooses diction that he knows the reader will be able to understand.  In addressing the three main schools of thought about the Internet, instead of using a complicated name to characterize them, Gopnik refers to them as “the Never-Betters, the Better-Nevers, and the Ever-Wasers” (2).  This choice in particular is essential in helping the reader to understand Gopnik’s thesis.  As mentioned, Gopnik is effective at prompting the reader to continue reading.  However, if the reader just continues for the sake of laughing at the few sentences of humor that he uses, then Gopnik’s editorial will all be for naught.  He therefore uses diction to give his essay meaning.  He knows that his thesis is complex, and he thus employs diction to help the reader glean something worthwhile from his editorial.
            Despite the regularity and commonness that Gopnik introduces however, “The Information” is still written in an academic style.  Gopnik accomplishes this through syntax.  Because his diction is rather ordinary, he uses long sentences to give his piece a strong voice.  This helps to solidify his argument, as the complex sentence structures that he employs give credibility to what he’s saying. Without this syntax, Gopnik would lose his academic voice and thus would lose authority in the eyes of the reader.  Although essential, this is Gopnik’s weak point.  His syntax is often so complex that meaning is lost entirely.  However, despite this setback, Gopnik is effective at communicating his thesis and leaves the reader disconcerted and completely persuaded.

Book Review Outside Reading: February 21

Book Review Outside Reading
“Joyce Carol Oates’s Widow’s Lament” by Ann Hulbert
A Review of A Widow’s Story by Joyce Carol Oates
The New York Times February 17, 2011

            In “Joyce Carol Oates’s Widow’s Lament,” Ann Hulbert commends Joyce Carol Oates’s memoir entitled A Widow’s Story.  This memoir largely encompasses Oates’s thoughts after her husband of forty-seven years passes away unexpectedly, and also what she learns about herself and their relationship after his death.  Because Hulbert’s review is so praiseworthy, the reader is left admiring Oates and wanting to read the memoir for themselves.
            Hulbert is able to add a sense of clarity to her review by describing in detail the stages of grief that Oates went through while writing her memoir.  Hulbert donates a good portion of her review to characterizing Oates and portraying her as a grieving widow.  Hulbert includes a quote from Oates herself, and in so doing is able to depict the extent of her sorrow.  “But now- I am not a writer now.  I am not anything now.  Legally I am a ‘widow’- that is the box I must check.  But beyond that- I am not sure that I exist” (1).  Hulbert’s inclusion of this quote and others similar to it help the reader to get a glimpse of what Oates experienced, and are vital to the reader’s understanding of the review.  Hulbert also uses diction to accomplish the clarity of the piece.  She chooses words such as “echoes,” “hauntingly,” “chattering,” and “sweaty-clammy” to instill a sense of sympathy in the reader, and thus helps the reader to understand how deeply the loss of Oates’s husband affected her.  As her memoir is entirely about that experience, it is vital that Hulbert introduces Oates’s emotions to the reader.  The long sentences that Hulbert employs as well reflect Oates’s longing for her husband and further the extent to which the reader connects with the piece.  This is Hulbert’s biggest strength.  Without understanding Oates’s loss, the reader would be left unconnected with the review and unconcerned with the memoir.
            After explaining the grief that Oates experienced, Hulbert next begins to discuss the memoir itself.  Writing the memoir was largely a revelatory experience for Oates, and Hulbert praises her for her efforts and compares her to writers such as Joan Didion and Emily Dickinson.  This helps the reader to connect with the piece even further.  By introducing other novelists and poets that the reader may be familiar with, Hulbert is linking Oates’s work directly to what the reader can sympathize with.  This is another of Hulbert’s strengths.
            As Hulbert’s piece focuses almost entirely on the life and experiences of Oates, she employs mostly New Historicism in her review.  However, I also would consider this to be Hulbert’s weakness.  She focuses so much on Oates and only assigns one paragraph of the whole piece to the subject of Oates’s memoir: her husband.  Despite this setback however, Hulbert is able to construct her review in a clear way that allows the reader to connect and sympathize with Oates, and the reader is thus left admiring Oates as a person and thirsting to read her memoir.

Class Notes: February 7-February 17

Class Notes: February 7-February 17
We’ve been studying Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness.

Heart of Darkness
·         Post-colonial novella
·         Set in the Belgian Congo
·         Conrad includes a lot of allusions to the Garden of Eden and Dante’s Inferno, and thus introduces a lot of symbolism revolving around heaven and hell (the Congo is both)
·         Uses a lot of contrasts; discusses the relationships between light and dark, heaven and hell, good and evil
·         The African woman, who Kurtz most likely has some type of a sexual relationship with, stands to represent the African people/society

Chinua Achebe’s review
·         Discusses that despite Conrad’s foreward thinking, he still is a racist

Mark Dintenfass’s review
·         Joseph Conrad spent time in Africa as Marlow does in Heart of Darkness, and “like Marlow, the experience left him morally shaken and physically ill” (1)
·         “the messiness and confusion and darkness of experience is in itself an interesting thing” (3)
·         “[Novelists] are rather in the business of re-creating and communicating the rich complexities of experience itself” (4)
·         This can make novels extremely confusing, especially in the case of Heart of Darkness
·         “Explicitness, my dear fellow, is fatal to the glamour of all artistic work” (6)
·         “We can try to understand Heart of Darkness in various ways depending upon what sorts of questions we ask of it” (7)

Apocalypse Now
·         Movie representation of Heart of Darkness
·         Although the movie follows roughly the same plot line, it is set in Vietnam instead of the Congo

Monday, February 7, 2011

Class Notes: January 24-February 4

Class Notes: January 24-February 4
We’ve been reading Heart of Darkness and studying other pertinent information.

Archetypal and Mythological Criticism
·        A myth is a complete story while an archetype can be a plot, a character, a setting, or a symbolic object
·        James Frazer: anthropologist that begins to notice similarities in myths across cultures (ex: death-rebirth myth)
·        Carl Jung: archetypes spring from the “collective unconscious”
·        Joseph Campbell: the “monomyth”
·        Northrop Frye: developed these ideas into a type of literary criticism
Mythoi: archetypal narrative patterns
Mode: variations in ancient narrative patterns as a result of cultural tastes of the work’s historical period
Displacement: variations in ancient narrative patterns as a result of the individual personality of the author
Frye’s Romance
·        Early literature; the first type of story to develop
·        Hero begins at the top of society, goes on a quest, reaches the bottom of society (the “belly of the whale,” and then resurfaces at the top of society
·        Example: The Odyssey
Frye’s Tragedy
·        The second form of literature to develop (Middle Ages and Renaissance)
·        The hero makes a fatal error or has a fatal flaw that causes him to fall
·        Desirable to undesirable circumstances
·        Hero often functions as a cultural embodiment
·        “This is what happens when you don’t stay in line with society”
Frye’s Comedy
·        The third form of literature to develop (Victorian Era, Romantic Era, Great Depression)
·        Undesirable to desirable circumstances (opposite of tragedy)
·        Tends to end with marriage and unexpected wealth
·        Societal reinforcement that even common folk can end up happy and successful
·        Discourages social friction
Frye’s Irony
·        The last form of literature to develop
·        Anti-Romance essentially
·        Hero begins at the bottom of society, begins to move up the social ladder, is happy for a while, and then descends back to the “belly of the whale”l
·        Enforces the idea that life and society are meaningless
·        Examples: Death of a Salesman, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead

Everyman
·        A short play of about 900 lines
·        “we can take with us from this word nothing that we have received, only what we have given” (Everyman handout)
·        The Everyman character is the important part (the main character who represents all of humankind)

Medievalism and Allegory
·        Europe’s Middle Ages (c. 500-1500 A.D.)
·        Christian-dominated era
·        Beowulf, The Canterbury Tales]
Allegory
·        An extended metaphor
·        Not ambiguous like symbolism is
·        Reinforces the social system, because of the Middle Ages’ homogeneity of belief
·        Becomes extremely prominent during the Middle Ages (seen as a hallmark of Medieval literature)
·        Usually concerned with important things, but sometimes satirical too
·        During the Middle Ages, characters usually represented things like envy, truth, gluttony, etc.
·        Example: The Wizard of Oz (and populism)
The Divine Comedy
·        Dante Alighieri wrote it sometime between 1308 and 1321
·        Three-part epic (Inferno, Purgatorio, Paradiso)
·        Dante travels through hell, purgatory, and heaven
·        Virgil and Beatrice (Dante’s lifelong love, NOT his wife) lead him throughout the epic
·        Introduces the ideas of the circle and the great chain of being

The Novel
·        Novella: “little new thing”
·        Or a roman: derived from the term romance
·        Novel: a fictional prose narrative of considerable length (30,000-100,000 words) and complexity that deals imaginatively with human experience
·        First European novel is usually considered to be Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes (the first part of which was published in 1605)
·        Must have literary merit (a piece of mass market fiction is NOT a novel)
·        Not applied to prose narratives written before the 18th century
·        Always fiction, but not always prose
·        Always contain narrative
·        Types include: Prose Romance, Novel of Incident, Novel of Character, Novel of Manners, Epistolary Novel, Picaresque Novel, Historical Novel, Regional Novel, Bildungsroman, Roman a clef, Roman-fleuve, Sociological, Stream of Consciousness, Gothic, Gothic Romance, and Satirical
By the second half of the 19th Century, the novel had displaced other forms of literature.  Why?
·        The growing middle class and their increased literacy rate and disposable income
·        Cheaper production and distribution of materials
·        Publication of novels in serial form
·        The introduction of a system of circulating libraries

Important Literary Terms
·        Anaphora: emphasizing words by repeating them at the beginnings of neighboring clauses
·        Antistrophe: the repetition of the same word or words at the end of successive phrases
·        Anadiplosis: the repetition of a word or phrase from the end of one clause or phrase at the beginning of the next clause or phrase
·        Polysyndeton: the repetition of conjunctions in a series of coordinate words, phrases, or clauses
·        Alliteration, Assonance, and Consonance
·        Antithesis: establishing a clear, contrasting relationship between two ideas by joining them together of juxtaposing them, often in parallel structure
·        Chiasmus: figure of speech in which two or more clauses are related to each other through a reversal of structures in order to make a larger point; that is, the clauses display inverted parallelism

Basic Trends in Western Literature (Classical to Postmodernist)
·        Shift of power
·        Powerful/strong dissolves into less powerful/disorderly
·        Focus moves from God to man and from knowing to not knowing

Monday, January 10, 2011

Book Review Outside Reading: January 10

Book Review Outside Reading
“Between Peace and Pain” by Maaza Mengiste
A Review of The Memory of Love by Aminatta Forna
The New York Times January 7, 2011

In “Between Peace and Pain,” Maaza Mengiste commends Aminatta Forna for her recent novel, The Memory of Love.  In this review, Mengiste praises Forna, but also discusses the one shortcoming she found in this new publication.  However, because Mengiste is so complimentary of The Memory of Love, the reader is left admiring Forna as a writer and looking for a copy of the piece to read themselves.
In reviewing The Memory of Love, Mengiste employs mostly Post-Colonial criticism.  She begins by explaining the time periods that the novel encompasses, which include Sierra Leone’s colonial struggle with the United Kingdom, their eventual independence, the intermittent years in which the new country struggles to establish themselves as such, and the Civil War that erupts as a result.  However, Mengiste also discusses the effects of the previous colonizer on the new country.  “Hers is a luminous tale of passion and betrayal, encompassing the political unrest that racked Sierra Leone in the late 1960s and the ruinous civil war of the 1990s, as well as the days of tenuous quiet when those who managed to stay alive struggled to cope with the physical and mental scars of those years” (1).  The role of post-colonial criticism in this review reminds me of what can be used to analyze Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe.
Mengiste adopts a very clear voice in this review, and in so doing constructs a well organized piece.  She leads her reader through a well thought-out chain of claims that, along with the warrants she chooses to support them, support her in her praise of Forna.  Mengiste also employs an academic voice that she crafts by displacing syntax and forming compound sentences that add complexity to “Between Peace and Pain.”  The title alone suggests density and the alliteration of the title once again adds to the intricate nature of the review.  The organization and academic voice that Mengiste creates are her two main strengths; through them she is able to effectively communicate how successful of an author she believes Forna to be.
Despite her overwhelming praise of Forna, however, Mengiste also points out what she sees as Forna’s only flaw.  Mengiste describes The Memory of Love as a complex novel full of “interconnecting story lines” (2) that are a result of Forna’s “risks with plot and character” (2).  This point of Mengiste’s is concluded with a discussion of one particular plot point.  “When [a main character] falls in love with a young woman, Mamakay, the writing is powerful, but credulity is strained by a dubious plot twist concerning the woman’s identity and parentage” (2).  Therefore, Mengiste does not just praise Forna.  However, because her one flaw with the author encompasses less than a paragraph of a nine-paragraph-work, a little of the validity of Mengiste’s argument is compromised.  It seemed, to me, that Mengiste was almost too complimentary of Forna; this, however, is Mengiste’s only weakness.



Class Notes: December 13-January 7

Class Notes: December 13-January 7
We’ve been studying Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman.

Miller uses nonrealistic techniques in the play.  What are they?
·         Willy’s flashbacks and memories: Willy essentially is living in the past and present simultaneously, which adds a lot of confusion to the text.
·         Willy’s conversations with Ben: This seems to me as Miller’s way of expressing Willy’s inner struggle; he regrets not going to Alaska with his brother Ben.

Linda treats Willy as her favorite son.
·         Linda mothers Willy throughout the entire play; she even helps him with the little things
·         Whenever Willy wants a snack, Linda offers milk/cheese (symbolic of breast feeding)
·         She threatens to kick Biff and Happy out if they cannot respect Willy and explains that her literal sons cannot come home to just visit Linda, they have to come to visit Willy too
·         Linda is the only parental figure in the play.  Willy acts like one of his sons and is always inflating their heads, while Linda is responsible for paying the bills and managing the household (something that women never did at this time in history)

The Happy/Willy and Willy/Ben relationships are similar.
·         Willy looks up to Ben just as Happy looks up to Willy
·         Willy and Happy never come to the realization that Biff does; they both have inflated heads
·         Happy views Willy as successful, just as Willy views Ben as successful
·         Happy never progresses beyond high school, just as Willy doesn’t (they “never grow up”)